Legal Opinion
HIGGINS v. HUHTAMAKI INC
District Court, D. Maine
Decided October 5, 2023No. 1:21-cv-00369Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE LAWRENCE HIGGINS, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs ) ) v. ) 1:21-cv-00369-JCN ) HUHTAMAKI, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants ) ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS Plaintiffs, homeowners in Fairfield, Maine, allege Defendants, which consist of the operator of a paper mill in Waterville, Maine, and three chemical companies, are responsible for contaminating their groundwater wells and exposing them to health risks from per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). (Complaint, ECF No. 1-1; Third Amended Complaint, ECF No. 227.) Residual PFAS from the paper mill’s…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Young v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.