Legal Opinion

State v. Reimer

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 24, 2001No. C5-00-1164PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge

Appellant challenges the district court’s pretrial order determining that the charges of driving with an expired driver’s license and gross misdemeanor DWI did not arise out of a single behavioral incident and could therefore be separately prosecuted. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Thane John Reimer was operating a motor vehicle when it went off the road into a ditch. Appellant’s motor vehicle driving record indicated that he had a prior conviction for driving while intoxicated (DWI), and his driving privileges had expired.

The investigating officer noted that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  2. State v. BookwalterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  3. State v. ReilandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  4. State v. ButcherCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  5. State v. ZuehlkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MarchbanksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  2. State of Minnesota v. Richard Lee CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API