Legal Opinion

Standard Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Kirkbride

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1991No. 900017PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

We granted appellants Thomas K. Kirk-bride and Rufe Soule permission to take an interlocutory appeal from a trial court ruling denying their motion to dismiss an action brought by Standard Federal Savings and Loan Association (“Standard Federal”). See Utah R.App.P. 5. In its complaint, Standard Federal sought a deficiency judgment for amounts remaining unpaid after the sale under a trust deed of property securing a note executed by Kirkbride and Soule. Kirkbride and Soule contend that the trial court should have dismissed the action as barred by section 57-1-32 of the Code.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Scharf v. BMG Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Madsen v. BorthickUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Foil v. BallingerUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State Ex Rel. Division of Consumer Protection v. Rio Vista Oil, Ltd.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Transamerica Cash Reserve, Inc. v. Dixie Power & Water, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jones, Waldo, Holbrook & McDonough v. DawsonUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Craig v. Provo CityUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Ewing v. State, Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010
  4. C. P. v. Utah Office of Crime Victims' ReparationsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
  5. HP Investments v. iLux Capital ManagementCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API