Legal Opinion

Calhoun, Denny & Ewing v. Pederson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1915No. 12388PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Mackintosh, J., entered May 21, 1914, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action upon a promissory note, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The purpose of this action was to recover upon a promissory note. The cause was tried to the court without a jury. Findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a judgment having been entered in favor of the plaintiff, the defendants have appealed.

*631The facts necessary to an understanding of the questions presented are as follows: On January 27, 1913, the defendants and W. C. Ashley and wife, being mutually desirous of exchanging certain real estate, entered into a contract wherein the plaintiff was named as party of the first part, the Ashleys as parties of the second part, and the defendants as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zindorf Construction Co. v. Western American Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Roehm v. HorstCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1898
  3. Eckenrode v. Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1880
  4. Bruggemann v. ConverseWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Ferris v. . Spooner, Etc.New York Court of Appeals · 1886

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Batter Building Materials Co. v. KirschnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  2. Brewster Cooperative Growers v. Brewster Orchards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Anderson v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Smith v. Town of TukwilaWashington Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API