Roehm v. Horst
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. This was an action for breach of a contract for the sale and delivery of hops at intervals extending over five years. There was a judgment for plaintiffs (84 Fed. 5(55), and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.
In August, 1893, Paul R. G. Horst, E. Clement Horst, and Louis A. Horst, trading as Horst Bros., (altered into a contract with John Boehm, the defendant below, for the sale of 1,000 hales of prime Pacific Coast hops, to be delivered al various dates in the future, at a uniform price of 22 cents per pound. Of the whole quaniity, 600 bales had been delivered, accepted, and paid for at the contract price, so that dn July, 1896, there remained undelivered 400 bales. These were deliverable at the rate of 20 bales per month during each month from October, 1896, to July,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anvil Mining Co. v. HumbleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Dingley v. OlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Boston Ice Co. v. PotterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Hinckley v. Pittsburgh Bessemer Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Campbellsville Lumber Co. v. Bradlee & WigginsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Dittman v. Model Baking Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. MarshSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
- In re SternCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1902
- Grand Forks Lumber Co. v. McClure Logging Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Kirchman v. Tuffli Bros. Pig Iron & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.