Legal Opinion
Bruggemann v. Converse
Washington Supreme Court
Decided November 19, 1907No. 6780PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Griffin, J., entered November 17, 1906, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action for specific performance of a contract to convey real estate.
1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.
The defendants were the owners of certain property 'in the city of Seattle, and on May 4, 1906, entered into the following contract:
“Seattle, Wash., May 4, 1906.
“Received of M. B. Bruggemann, as earnest money on account of purchase of the following described real estate, situate in King county, state of Washington, to-wit: Lot 5, block 5, division No. 1, Capitol Hill, sold for the sum of thirty-four hundred ($3,400.00) dollars, on the following terms of payment: $100.00 cash as above, $1,300.00 within ninety days, balance of $2,000.00 on or before May 1, 1908, all with 6 per cent annual…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Stein v. WaddellWashington Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gibson v. RouseWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Reese v. WestfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Brewster Cooperative Growers v. Brewster Orchards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1944
- Lewis v. WellardWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Calhoun, Denny & Ewing v. PedersonWashington Supreme Court · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.