Coffee-Rich, Inc. v. Fielder
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THOMPSON, J.
The case at bench reaches us after a decision by the superior court on remand from the Court of Appeal after reversal of a judgment reached at trial. It emphasizes two serious deficiencies in California appellate procedure. Substantively, the case illustrates the difficulties flowing from an appellate court judgment reversing and remanding for “further proceedings consistent with this opinion” where the opinion itself is not specific on what is to be done. Procedurally, the case illustrates the deficiency inherent in the lack of a rule of court requiring that so far as…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. ShueyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Tally v. GanahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Hampton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. MinnetteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Estate of StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Environmental Protection Information Center, Inc. v. Maxxam Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Frankel v. Four Star International, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1980
- Cooper v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- People v. PayneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Petrolink, Inc. v. Lantel Enterprises CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.