Legal Opinion

Maus v. Bloss

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1954PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGehl, J.

Defendant contends that his operation of a mink farm is an enterprise excluded from the operation of the safe-place statute. The statute applies to all places of employment except, among other operations, “farm labor when the employer is the farmer operating the farm and the labor is such as is customarily performed as a part of farming, and including the transportation of farm products immediately and directly from the farm, and of materials, supplies, or equipment directly to. the farm for use thereon.” Sec. 101.01 (1) (b), Stats.

In Eberlein v. Industrial Comm. 237 Wis. 555, 297 N. W. 429,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Delaney v. Supreme Investment Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Dodge County v. KaiserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Mullen v. Larson-Morgan Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Klein v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wenke Ex Rel. Laufenberg v. Gehl Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Lovesee v. Allied Development Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. State Ex Rel. Larson v. GiesselWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Bohn v. Sauk CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Milwaukee Fire Fighters Ass'n, Local 215 v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API