Legal Opinion

Redgate v. Sroga's Standard Service

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 8, 1988No. CX-87-1759, C1-87-1763PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SIMONETT, Justice.

This case raises the issue whether, under post-1983 law, an injured employee who has not reached maximum medical improvement, must make a diligent search for light duty work to receive temporary total disability benefits. We hold there is a diligent search requirement and that the evidence supports the compensation judge’s finding that no diligent search was made in this case. We reverse the contrary rulings of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals, but affirm the weekly wage calculation.

Employee-respondent Bruce Redgate injured his back on two occasions, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie JayceesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Schulte v. CH PETERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  3. McClish v. Pan-O-Gold Baking Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Scott v. Southview Chevrolet Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. Johnson v. State, Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Correa v. Waymouth Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  2. Boryca v. Marvin Lumber & CedarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  3. Pelowski v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  4. Tolzmann v. McCombs-Knutson AssociatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  5. Arouni v. Kelleher Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API