Legal Opinion
Daggett v. Yreka Mining & Milling Co.
California Supreme Court
Decided June 25, 1906No. Sac. No. 1154PublishedCited by 11 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.
This is an action to recover damages for alleged trespass consisting in the extraction and removal of gold-bearing ore from mining ground claimed by the plaintiffs.
The material allegations of the complaint are that the plaintiffs for twenty years last past have been the owners, and, save for the interruptions alleged, have been in possession of two certain quartz mines in Siskiyou County, known as the "Evening Star Quartz Mine ’ ’ and the ‘ ‘ Central Quartz Mine, ’ ’ more particularly described as follows:—
“That certain mine known as the Evening Star Quartz Mine, situated on the head waters…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Del Monte Mining & Milling Co. v. Last Chance Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Argonaut Mining Co. v. Kennedy Mining & Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Central Eureka Mining Co. v. East Central Eureka Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by11 opinions
- Stock v. PlunkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Sturtevant v. VogelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1909
- Brown v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Johnson v. RyanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
- Brugger v. Lee YimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.