Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Ryan
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided January 19, 1939No. 4403PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BICKLEY, Chief Justice.
■ This is an action commenced by plaintiffs (appellants) to recover possession of a mining claim and to quiet title thereto, and for damages. The case was tried to the court. The court made findings of fact based upon the evidence, in substance that plaintiffs had performed all necessary acts in locating this mining claim, with the exception of recording a copy of the location notice, and rendered judgment in favor of defendants.
There is no bill of exceptions or transcript of the evidence in the record, so our decision must be arrived at solely from the findings of fact…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Book v. Justice Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1893
- Lockhart v. LeedsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Jupiter Mining Co. v. Bodie Consolidated Mining Co.District Court, D. California · 1881
- Butte & Superior Copper Co. v. Clark-Montana Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Gleeson v. Martin White Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1878
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Munro v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
- Independence Placer Mining Co. v. HellmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
- Columbia Standard Corporation, a Nevada Corporation v. Ranchers Exploration & Development, Inc., a New Mexico CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Continental Oil Company, a Corporation, and Cross-Appellee v. Natrona Service, Inc., a Corporation, and John W. MacGuire and Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- Winslow v. BurnsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.