Legal Opinion

Argonaut Mining Co. v. Kennedy Mining & Milling Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1900No. Sac. No. 733PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.

This is an action for damages for the value of ore alleged to have been taken by defendant from plaintiff’s mine, situate in Amador county. The defendant denies taking any ore, or gold-bearing rock, from plaintiff’s mine, and avers that defendant is the owner of the mine from which the rock was taken.

The cause was submitted in the trial court upon an agreed statement of facts, each party having the right to object to the relevancy, competency, and materiality of any part of it. Certain objections to evidence were made by the appellant, which were overruled by the court, and the main argument…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Del Monte Mining & Milling Co. v. Last Chance Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Eureka Consol. Min. Co. v. Richmond Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1877
  3. Iron Silver Mining Co. v. Elgin Mining & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Walrath v. Champion Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Troensegaard v. Silvercrest Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Daggett v. Yreka Mining & Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Central Eureka Mining Co. v. East Central Eureka Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Troensegaard v. Silvercrest Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Brooks v. Tarsadia HotelsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API