Legal Opinion

United States v. Kluttz

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided March 14, 1958No. 10,230PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

GEORGE W. LatimeR, Judge:

The accused was charged with burglary with intent to commit rape, in violation of Article 129, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 929, and with assault with intent to commit rape, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 934. By exceptions and substitutions, a general court-martial found him guilty of burglary with intent to commit indecent assault and of indecent assault, in violation of the same respective Articles. He was sentenced to be dishonorably discharged, to forfeit all pay and allowances, and to be…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. ParkerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  2. United States v. JonesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  3. United States v. HobbsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  4. United States v. HopfUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  5. United States v. BurdenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. WilsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. ThackerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
  3. United States v. CatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  4. United States v. ClayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  5. United States v. SampsonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API