Legal Opinion
Bright v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 3, 2010No. 2009-5048PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHALL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs-Appellants (“Appellants”) are putative members of a class of landowners seeking compensation under the Fifth Amendment pursuant to the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1). They seek compensation for the alleged taking of their respective property interests under the National Trail Systems Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 1241-1251 (the “Trails Act”). The United States Court of Federal Claims dismissed Appellants’ second amended complaint as to all named plaintiffs other than Earleen Fauvergue, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Fauvergue v. United States, 86 Fed.Cl. 82…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Police & Fire Retirement System v. IndyMac MBS, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Albano v. Shea Homes Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Silvercreek Management, Inc. v. Citigroup, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Geneva Rock Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Wultz v. Bank of China Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.