Legal Opinion

Johnston v. City of Hartford

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 5, 1921PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Suit to secure an adjudication of the invalidity of a street-paving assessment aud of a lien filed by the city therefor, brought to and reserved by the City Court of Hartford, Bullard, J., upon a demurrer to the complaint, for the advice of this court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurpee, J.

In this reservation the advice of this court is desired upon the issues of law raised by the defendant’s demurrer to the complaint. The principal admitted facts are that in the summer of 1919 the city of Hartford, without petition therefor, caused to be paved with asphalt a part of a street within its original limits, called Wethersfield Avenue, not exceeding four miles in length, in addition to pavement petitioned for by property owners. Two thirds of the cost of this pavement was assessed upon property abutting on the line of the improvement, and one third upon the city itself to be paid…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Johnston v. Standard Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Norwalk Gaslight Co. v. Borough of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
  3. Bernhard v. Rochester German InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
  4. O'BRIEN v. WheelockSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. Board of Commissioners v. PlotnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  2. Blakeslee v. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  3. Aczas v. Stuart Heights, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  4. Langbein v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  5. Litchfield v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API