Legal Opinion
Hunt v. Magnell
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 8, 1991No. Civ. 3-89-756PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DEVITT, District Judge.
Introduction
This action based upon the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) is before the court for the consideration of various motions brought by all parties. Plaintiffs move for partial summary judgment and ask the court to strike certain affidavits filed by defendants. Defendants move for the dismissal of certain counts of plaintiffs complaint and for summary judgment on other counts. 1 For the reasons set forth below, the court denies plaintiffs’ motions. The court grants defendants’ motion for summary judgment based upon ERISA’s statute of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Donovan v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Ronald Fink v. National Savings and Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Abraham Loudermill and Joyce Loudermill v. The Dow Chemical Company v. M-P Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Russell C. Larson v. Northrop CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Meyer v. Berkshire Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2003
- Harley v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
- In Re Milk Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
- Mazur v. GaudetDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.