Legal Opinion
Harley v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 31, 1999No. Civ. 4-96-488(JRT/RLE)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
TUNHEIM, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, brought this action against defendant Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co. (“3M”), alleging that 3M breached its fiduciary duty under section 404(a)(1)(B) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1104(a)(1)(B), by failing to invest prudently the assets of the 3M Employee Retirement Income Plan (“the Plan”). In an Order dated September 25, 1997, the Court certified a class of all participants and beneficiaries of the Plan (“the Class”).
This…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Donna Krenik v. County of Le SueurCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. JacobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Carol Harley v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, Carol Harley v. Guillo AgostiniCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Stargel v. Suntrust Banks, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2013
- Keach v. U.S. Trust Co., N.A.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2004
- Walsh v. Principal Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2010
- Frederick Rozo v. Principal Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.