Eckis v. Sea World Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
AULT, J.
Defendants Sea World and Kent Burgess have appealed from a judgment entered on a jury verdict awarding Anne E. Eckis $75,000 in compensatory damages. Plaintiff had sought both compensatory and punitive damages for personal injuries she sustained while riding “Shamu the Whale,” framing her complaint on three theories: fraud, negligence, and liability for an animal with vicious or dangerous propensities. Before the case was submitted to the jury, the trial court denied Sea World’s motion for a nonsuit on the fraud cause of action. Later its motions for judgment notwithstanding…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Boynton v. McKalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Freire v. Matson Navigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Dimmig v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Laeng v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Johns-Manville Products Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Neighbours v. Buzz Oates EnterprisesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Minish v. Hanuman FellowshipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Iverson v. Atlas Pacific EngineeringCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.