P.A. v. A.H.O.

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] A.H.O. appealed from a district court judgment granting A.H.O. and P.A. joint custody of their son, J.O. A.H.O. argues that she should have been awarded primary physical custody. P.A. cross-appeals, asserting that the district court did not err in awarding joint custody, but if it was error, he should have been given primary physical custody. We affirm, holding that the district court was not clearly erroneous in awarding joint custody.

I

[¶ 2] Our review of the record reveals the following facts: J.O. was born in August 2002. His parents, A.H.O. and P.A., were…