Legal Opinion

Peek v. Berning

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 2001No. 20000056PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Malcolm R. Peek appeals from the district court’s judgment finding the best interests of the child supported an award of joint legal and physical custody with a schedule of rotating physical custody. We reverse and remand for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.

I

[¶ 2] Malcolm R. Peek and Kimberly J. Berning were never married, but in February 1997 they had one child together. Berning also has two other children who reside with her. When Peek and Bern-ing’s child was born, Berning was employed as a registered nurse in North Dakota, and Peek was working on…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lapp v. LappNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Ackerman v. AckermanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Cox v. CoxNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Brown v. BrownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Silseth v. LevangNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Hammeren v. HammerenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Marsden v. KoopNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Klein v. LarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Clark v. ClarkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Knutson v. KnutsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API