Legal Opinion

Rustad v. Rustad

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 2014No. 20140014PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEVERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Rick Rustad appeals and Svetlana Rustad cross-appeals from an amended judgment awarding her primary residential responsibility for the parties’ minor child. We affirm, concluding the district court’s decision to award Svetlana Rustad primary residential responsibility is not clearly erroneous.

I

[¶ 2] Rick and Svetlana Rustad were married in February 2008 and have one minor child together, who was born in 2011. Svetlana Rustad is a permanent resident of the United States and a Russian citizen. The parties lived in Kindred during the marriage. Rick Rustad is self-employed…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Tom Beuchler Construction, Inc. v. City of WillistonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Heinle v. HeinleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Heinle v. HeinleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Lindberg v. LindbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Weber v. WeberNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rustad v. BaumgartnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Edison v. EdisonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  3. Chornuk v. NelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Rustad v. BaumgartnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Rustad v. BaumgartnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API