Legal Opinion

Boeckel v. Boeckel

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 2010No. 20090302PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Jocelyn Boeckel appeals from an amended divorce judgment. We affirm the district court’s valuation and distribution of the parties’ marital estate and its refusal to award attorney fees to Jocelyn Boeckel. We reverse and remand the case for further findings regarding the applicability of the rebuttable presumption against awarding custody to the perpetrator of domestic abuse.

I

[¶ 2] Darnell Boeckel and Jocelyn Boeckel were married in 1994 and lived on a farm near Lemmon, S.D. The parties have three children together, aged eight to fourteen at the time of trial. In April…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kautzman v. KautzmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Heinle v. HeinleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Heinle v. HeinleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Kostelecky v. KosteleckyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Rothberg v. RothbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kosobud v. KosobudNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Datz v. DoschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. NeustelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Mowan v. BergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Vetter v. VetterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API