Loftus v. Fischer
California Supreme Court
Appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tuolumne County and from an order directing a receiver to turn over property to the defendant corporation. ' Gr. W. INicol, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court, and in the cases referred to therein, as decided between the same parties, upon former appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
These are separate appeals from the judgment, taken within sixty days after its rendition, the evidence being brought up for review by a bill of exceptions. In the case numbered Sacramento 123 the plaintiffs are appellants; in the case numbered. Sacramento 185 defendant Behlow is appellant. As the points presented upon both appeals are identical, they may be considered in one opinion.
There are also appeals from an order of the court made after final judgment directing the receiver to turn over the property to the defendant corporation, the Consolidated Golden Gate and Sulphuret Mining and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fischer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Loftus v. FischerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Behlow v. FischerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Loftus v. FischerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Fischer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893