Legal Opinion

Behlow v. Fischer

California Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1894No. 18144PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tuolumne County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

In April, 1889, William G.Long, Jacob A. Fischer, Edward C. Loftus, and Charles J. Behlow *212formed a copartnership for the purpose of purchasing and working certain mining claims in Tuolumne county upon certain terms agreed upon between them, and thereafter acquired the mining properties contemplated by their agreement. September 1,1889, these four partners agreed among themselves to form a corporation under the laws of this state, with a capital stock of 60.000 shares, for the purpose of carrying on the business of the partnership under a corporate name, and agreed that, upon the organization…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fischer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Hunt v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Turner v. Fidelity Loan ConcernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  4. Baldwin v. Miller & LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Chatten v. MartellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API