Legal Opinion

Fischer v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1893No. 15175PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Application to the Supreme Court for a writ of prohibition. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

During the pendency of an action entitled Behlow et al. v. Fischer et al., one Lane was appointed receiver to take possession of and manage certain mining property pending the result of the litigation. Subsequently a judgment was rendered for plaintiffs in said action, in which judgment said Lane was re-appointed receiver, with full power and authority to manage, conduct, and carry on this mining property.

The present proceeding is an application for a writ of prohibition, commanding respondents to desist from acting under said order. The application for the writ and the order to show cause…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fischer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Loftus v. FischerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API