Legal Opinion

Endo v. Albertine

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 29, 1994No. 88 C 1815PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HOLDERMAN, District Judge:

Plaintiffs Henry T. Endo, John Lesch and Frank Tracy, on behalf of themselves and a class of similarly situated individuals, 1 initial ly filed a nine-count complaint against defendants Fruit of the Loom, Inc. (“FOL”), various directors and officers of FOL including John M. Albertine, William F. Farley, William K. Hall, Richard M. Cion, Douglas M. Kinney, and Robert J. Meier (collectively referred to as “FOL defendants”), accounting firms Arthur Andersen & Co. and Ernst & Young, and investment banking firms Drexel Burnham Lambert Inc., 2…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cashman v. Coopers & LybrandDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
  2. Raymond Professional Group, Inc. v. William A. Pope Co. (In Re Raymond Professional Group, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
  3. Danis v. USN Communications, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
  4. Olczyk v. Cerion Technologies, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  5. In Re Neopharm, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API