Legal Opinion
Cashman v. Coopers & Lybrand
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 27, 1995No. 93-C-1284PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CASTILLO, District Judge.
This case involves allegations of securities fraud brought under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77(k)(Count I); Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5 (Count II). State law claims alleging common law fraud are also pled under principles of pendant jurisdiction. De fendant, Coopers & Lybrand (“Coopers”), has filed a Motion to Dismiss the Third Amended Complaint (#33-1) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). In…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 90,266 Irene L. Wright, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Ernst & Young LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & ERISA Lit.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2002
- In Re: Ikon Office Solutions, Inc., Securities Litigation City of Philadelphia, Through Its Board of Pensions and Retirement, Oliver Scofield and Lawrence Porter, as Representatives of a Certified Class ConsistingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Picard Chemical Inc. Profit Sharing Plan v. Perrigo Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1996
- Anixter v. Home-Stake Production Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.