Legal Opinion
Butrick v. Peterbilt of Springfield, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided January 30, 2012No. SD 31251PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT S. BARNEY, Judge.
Peterbilt of Springfield, Inc. (“Employer”) appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s (“the Commission”) “Order” adopting the decision of the Appeals Tribunal which had determined that Robert Butrick (“Claimant”) was not disqualified from receiving unemployment compensation benefits following his termination from Employer.1 In its sole point relied on, Employer asserts the Commission erred in concluding Claimant was not disqualified from unemployment compensation benefits because the evidence showed he was discharged for misconduct connected to work…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Difatta-Wheaton v. Dolphin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2008
- McClelland v. Hogan Personnel, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Ayers v. Sylvia Thompson Residence CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Murphy v. Aaron's Automotive ProductsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Scrivener Oil Co., Inc. v. CriderMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- TAMKO BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC., Employer-Appellant v. DANIEL PICKARD, Claimant-Respondent, and MISSOURI DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITYMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- Dearborn v. Great Southern Financial Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- JENNIFER DEARBORN, Claimant-Respondent v. GREAT SOUTHERN FINANCIAL CORPORATION, Employer-Appellant, DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITYMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014