TAMKO BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC., Employer-Appellant v. DANIEL PICKARD, Claimant-Respondent, and MISSOURI DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtJeffrey W. Bates, P.J.
Tamko Building Products, Inc. (Employer) appeals from a decision by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) awarding unemployment benefits to Daniel Pickard (Employee). The Commission determined that Employee was not disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits because his discharge was not for misconduct connected with work. See § 288.050.2. 1 In a single point relied on, Employer contends the Commission erred in its determination because the facts found by the Commission do not support the award and/or the award was not supported by sufficient competent evidence in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fendler v. Hudson ServicesSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- McClelland v. Hogan Personnel, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Seck v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
- Finner v. Americold Logistics, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- Robinson v. COURTYARD MANAGEMENT CORP.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kirk Wilson v. Progressive Waste Solutions of MO, Inc., and Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Stahl v. Hank's Cheesecakes, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Zinevich v. Digital Monitoring Products, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- Brunk v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- DAVID JACKSON, Claimant-Appellant v. EAGLEPICHER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Employer-Respondent, and MISSOURI DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.