Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re K.J.L.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 16, 2008No. COA08-284-2Published

1DissentHunter, Judge

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion's conclusion that this Court is bound by In re Mitchell, 126 N.C.App. 432, 433, 485 S.E.2d 623, 624 (1997), and that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to terminate respondent's parental rights. For the reasons set out herein, I believe that In re Howell, 161 N.C.App. 650, 589 S.E.2d 157 (2003), is controlling and that Rule 12 of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure is applicable. Therefore, I conclude that the trial court had subject matter jurisdiction, and acquired personal jurisdiction over respondent by respondent's…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Matter of BallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. In Re YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  3. Bryson v. SullivanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  4. In re J.A.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. Knight v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API