Legal Opinion

Morris v. . Cleve

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 22, 1929PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

The original complaint in this action was filed on 23 September, 1924. The defendants, D. W. and W. A. Cleve, demurred to said complaint, chiefly on the ground that the facts stated therein are not sufficient to constitute a cause of action against them. From judgment sustaining said demurrer, plaintiff appealed to this Court. The judgment was affirmed. Morris v. Cleve, 193 N. C., 389, 137 S. E., 162. It appeared upon the face of the complaint that plaintiff had discounted the note executed by said defendants and payable to his order, for value and before maturity, and that he was not the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Farmers & Merchants Bank of Monroe v. Federal Reserve Bank of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. MalloySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. City of Douglas v. Federal Reserve Bank of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Price v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  5. Anderson v. GillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Steele v. VandersliceArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Wallace v. . BennerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Cody v. . HoveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Adams v. . CleveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. McKeel v. . LathamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API