Legal Opinion

David Co. v. Jim W. Miller Construction, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 26, 1988No. C6-88-327PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EDWARD D. MULALLY, Judge.

Respondent David Company (David Co.) demanded arbitration of its claim of breach of a construction contract against Jim W. Miller Construction, Inc. (Miller). The arbitrators awarded David Co. damages of $884,476 and awarded Miller the property in issue. David Co. applied for confirmation of the arbitration award and Miller applied for vacation of the award.

The trial court confirmed the arbitration award and ordered entry of judgment. Miller appealed the order and judgment. This court dismissed the appeal and remanded for detailed findings on the issue of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Doers v. Golden Gate Bridge, Higway & Transportation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. BerthiaumeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Willoughby Roofing & Supply Co. v. Kajima International, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1984
  4. Grudem Brothers Co. v. Great Western Piping Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  5. Hilltop Construction, Inc. v. Lou Park ApartmentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Collins v. D.R. Horton, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2005
  2. David Co. v. Jim W. Miller Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Olson v. RonhovdeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  4. Fedie v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  5. David Co. v. Jim W. Miller Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API