Legal Opinion

David Co. v. Jim W. Miller Construction, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 26, 1988No. C6-88-327Published

1Opinion of the Court

428 N.W.2d 590 (1988)

DAVID COMPANY, Respondent,

v.

JIM W. MILLER CONSTRUCTION, INC., Appellant.

No. C6-88-327.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

August 30, 1988.

Review Granted October 26, 1988.

Sue R. Halverson, Hart, Bruner & O'Brien, P.A., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Ronald E. Martell, Moore, Costello & Hart, St. Paul, for appellant.

Heard, considered and decided by SCHUMACHER, P.J., and RANDALL and MULALLY[*], JJ.

OPINION

EDWARD D. MULALLY, Judge.

Respondent David Company (David Co.) demanded arbitration of its claim of breach of a construction contract against Jim W. Miller Construction, Inc.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Doers v. Golden Gate Bridge, Higway & Transportation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. BerthiaumeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Willoughby Roofing & Supply Co. v. Kajima International, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1984
  4. Grudem Brothers Co. v. Great Western Piping Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  5. Hilltop Construction, Inc. v. Lou Park ApartmentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API