Legal Opinion

Fuller v. Friedman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1924No. 18432PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This action was brought to recover damages alleged to have been caused by the defendants in the negligent driving of their automobile. The answer denied negligence and affirmatively alleged contributory negligence. There was a verdict for the plaintiffs in the sum of $625. They moved for a new trial upon the grounds, (1) irregularity in the proceedings which prevented them from having a fair trial, (2) misconduct of the defendants and the jury, (3) inadequacy of the damages appearing^to have been given under the influence of passion and prejudice, *283and (4) errors in law occurring at the trial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Young v. DilleWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Rochester v. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Parkhurst v. ElliottWashington Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kalinowski v. Y.W.C.A.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Larson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  3. State v. DouglasWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Fuller v. FriedmanWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Kalinowski v. Young Women's Christian Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API