Legal Opinion

Parkhurst v. Elliott

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1918No. 14274PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for King county, Albertson, J., entered January 31, 1917, granting a new trial, after the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for damages.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

— This appeal is from an order of the lower court granting a new trial after verdict of a jury. The plaintiff has appealed.

The facts are, in substance, as follows: In May, 1915, the appellant was the owner of a house and lot in the city of Seattle. This property, valued at $3,500, was listed with a real estate agent for sale, subject to a mortgage of $950. At that time Alfred E. Hart and wife were the holders of a note for $2,560, executed by Robert A. Campbell and wife and Susan S. Shaw to Zener-Hilt Company. This note was secured by a sec*90ond mortgage upon 19.83 acres of land in Okanogan…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rochester v. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. City of Tacoma v. Tacoma Light & Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897
  3. West v. CarterWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Stanton v. ZercherWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Walsh v. MeyerWashington Supreme Court · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Larson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Westby v. GorsuchCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  3. Godefroy v. ReillyWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Westby v. GorsuchCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. Edwards v. PowellWashington Supreme Court · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API