Legal Opinion
Persky v. Cendant Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 15, 2008No. 3:99CV2273 (EBB)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LIQUIDATED DAMAGES
ELLEN BREE BURNS, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Kim Persky (“Plaintiff’ or “Persky”) moves this court for an award of liquidated damages under the Family Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2617(a). For the following reasons, the Court awards Plaintiff liquidated damages in the amount of $496,344.
Factual Background
The following facts consist of those deemed necessary to an understanding of the issues raised in, and decision rendered on, this motion. The facts are culled from prior decisions from the Connecticut Department of Labor,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Rhoads v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- Xin Liu v. Amway Corporation Does 1-50 InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- John F. Rogers v. The City of Troy, New York David M. Grandeau, in His Official Capacity as City Manager of the City of Troy, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Ronald Cobb v. Contract Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Coulibaly v. KerryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Kinkead v. Humana, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
- Ramadei v. Radiall USA, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2024