Legal Opinion

Kinkead v. Humana, Inc.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided March 31, 2020No. 3:15-cv-01637Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT DAVERLYNN KINKEAD et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, No. 3:15-cv-01637 (JAM) v. HUMANA AT HOME, INC. et al., Defendants. ORDER GRANTING IN PART, DENYING IN PART, AND DEFERRING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiffs are home healthcare workers employed by defendant Humana, Inc. and its corporate affiliates. They have filed this collective and class action lawsuit alleging that defendants have unlawfully failed to pay them regular and…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Tolan v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Lundy v. Catholic Health System of Long Island Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  5. Nakahata v. New York-Presbyterian Healthcare System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API