Legal Opinion

Austero v. Washington National Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 1982No. Civ. 23779PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUFMAN, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment, after retrial, awarding compensatory and punitive damages against it for bad faith failure to pay plaintiffs’ claims under two insurance policies.1 Defendant does not challenge the damages awarded to compensate plaintiffs for the benefits they should have received under the policies (approximately $24,678), but do claim error in the award of $25,000 to plaintiff Dorothy Austero for emotional distress, $200,000 for attorney’s fees, and $200,000 as punitive damages. The award for emotional distress is not supported by substantial evidence;…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Fletcher v. Western National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Silberg v. California Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Brandt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. CNA Casualty of California v. Seaboard Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Gray v. Don Miller & Associates, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  4. McLaughlin v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Delgado v. Heritage Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API