Legal Opinion
Loussier v. Universal Music Group, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 10, 2003No. 02 Civ. 2447(KMW)(RLE)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ELLIS, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Before this Court is a motion by defendants Universal Music Group, Interscope Records, Marshal Mathers (“Eminem”) and Andre Young (“Dr. Dre”) (collectively “defendants”) for a protective order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) seeking to designate the videotaped and stereo-graphically recorded depositions of certain parties. The plaintiff Jacques Loussier (“Loussier”) has also filed a motion to compel discovery of any complaints and cease and desist letters and the disposition of those claims against Dr. Dre…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Lipton v. The Nature CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Coleman v. ESPN, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Paisley Park Enterprises, Inc. v. Uptown ProductionsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Twin Peaks Productions, Inc. v. Publications International, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
3Cited by8 opinions
- Duling v. Gristede's Operating Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Mitchell v. FishbeinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Condit v. DunneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- American Rock Salt Co. v. Norfolk Southern Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 2004
- Pia v. Supernova Media, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.