Charmac, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FROEHLICH, J.
This appeal requires interpretation of Insurance Code1 section 11580.9, subdivision (c), which generally provides that when a loss arises in connection with the loading or unloading of a vehicle, and there are two or more policies of insurance “applicable to the same loss,” the insurance policy which covers the premises is presumed to be the primary policy, and the vehicle insurance policy is relegated to the role of excess insurer. The sole issue here is whether the trial court correctly construed section 11580.9, subdivision (c) as extending the coverage afforded by the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bowland v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re HubbardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- People v. AstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Nabisco, Inc. v. Transport Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Ross v. Canadian Indemnity InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Blue Cross of California v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993