Legal Opinion

Blue Cross of California v. Jones

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 5, 1993No. Docket Nos. A056295, A057138PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HANING, J.

In these consolidated appeals, plaintiff and appellant Blue Cross of California appeals a judgment confirming a private arbitration award in favor of defendants and respondents Grant and Laurie Jones in a dispute over health care benefits. Appellant contends the arbitrators acted in excess of their powers in reaching a “completely irrational” result.

Facts

In April 1985 respondents’ two-year-old son Todd nearly drowned in the family’s backyard swimming pool. As a result, he suffered severe anoxic encephalopathy and is essentially comatose, requiring constant care. Since late…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Fields v. Blue Shield of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Jones v. KvistadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Manatt, Phelps, Rothenberg, & Tunney v. LawrenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Jordan v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. California Faculty Ass'n. v. Superior Court of Santa Clara CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Rifkind & Sterling, Inc. v. RifkindCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Bonshire v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API