Legal Opinion

Barker v. Dominic

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 10, 2018PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The petition by the defendants the city of Bridgeport and PMA Insurance Company for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 183 Conn.App. 612, 193 A.3d 693 (2018), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, under General Statutes § 31-291, as construed by Massolini v. Driscoll, 114 Conn. 546, 159 A. 480 (1932), the defendant city of Bridgeport was liable for workers' compensation benefits as the principal employer of a worker hired by an uninsured subcontractor to repair the roof of a building owned by the city?"

D'AURIA, J., did not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Massolini v. DriscollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  2. Barker v. All Roofs by DominicConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Barker v. All Roofs by DominicSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API