Legal Opinion
Massolini v. Driscoll
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 5, 1932PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAvert, J.
From the finding of the commissioner, the following facts appear: January 21st, 1931, the respondent, Driscoll, had a team of horses which he was renting with a driver to the city of Hartford for $9 per day. The wagon to which the horses were attached belonged to the city, but the harness and other equipment belonged to Driscoll, who was in the teaming business and that of letting out and renting teams and horses with drivers. The city had no interest in who the driver of the team might be so long as he was competent; and did not attempt to exercise any particular supervision, control or…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Powers v. Hotel Bond Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- Linstead v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- The Parker Mills v. . the Commissioners of TaxesNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
- Easterbrook v. Hebrew Ladies Orphan SocietySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Bogoratt v. Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Marandino v. Prometheus PharmacySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Hoard v. Sears Roebuck Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Muldoon v. Homestead Insulation Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Alpha Crane Service, Inc. v. Capitol Crane Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. WallaceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.