Legal Opinion

Barker v. All Roofs by Dominic

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 13, 2020No. SC20196Published

1Opinion of the Court

Page 2 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL May 11, 2021 592 MAY, 2021

336 Conn. 592

Barker v. All Roofs by Dominic CHRISTOPHER BARKER v. ALL ROOFS BY DOMINIC ET AL. (SC 20196) Robinson, C. J., and Palmer, McDonald, Kahn, Ecker, Vertefeuille and Elgo, Js.* Syllabus Pursuant to a provision of the Workers’ Compensation Act (§ 31-291), ‘‘[w]hen any principal employer procures any work to be done wholly or in part for him by a contractor, or through him by a subcontractor, and the work so procured to be done is a part or process in the trade or business of such principal employer, and is performed in, on or…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Cabell v. MarkhamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  2. Markham v. CabellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Sandifer v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. State v. SalamonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  5. Henderson v. Central Tel. Co. of VirginiaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API