Legal Opinion
Barker v. All Roofs by Dominic
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 24, 2018No. AC40535PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSheldon, J.
The defendant, the city of Bridgeport (city), 1 appeals from the decision of the Compensation Review Board (board) affirming the finding and order of the Workers' Compensation Commissioner for the Third District (commissioner) holding that the city was the principal employer of the plaintiff Christopher Barker when he suffered a compensable injury while working for an uninsured subcontractor of the city on city property, and thus that the city was liable, pursuant to General Statutes § 31-291, 2 for all workers' compensation benefits 3 due to him in connection with that injury. The city…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Marandino v. Prometheus PharmacySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Massolini v. DriscollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Alpha Crane Service, Inc. v. Capitol Crane Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Gigliotti v. United Illuminating Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Powers v. UlichnySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Barker v. DominicSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- Barker v. All Roofs by DominicSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
- Barker v. All Roofs by DominicSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021