Magar v. Lifetime, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hirt, J.,
The plaintiff is a home owner in Philadelphia. The defendant corporation is engaged in the “home improvement business” with offices in that city. On February 26, 1955 the defendant by written contract with the plaintiff, undertook to “apply plastic plastering” on the four exterior walls of plaintiff’s cement block house for a consideration of $1,100. In this action the plaintiff alleged that the material applied to the building was not in conformity with the samples submitted by defendant at the time the contract was entered into; also that the material was improperly…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rice v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Maxwell v. SchaeferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Forrest v. BuchananSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Hood v. MeiningerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Myer Feinstein Co. v. De VincentSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Valhal Corp. v. Sullivan Associates, Inc., Architects, Planners, EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Southwest Forest Industries, Inc. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- New York State Electric & Gas Corp. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- K & C, Inc. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Lincoln Pulp & Paper Co., Inc. v. Dravo Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 1977
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.