Legal Opinion
Cady v. Mitchell
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 17, 1966No. Appeal, 44PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Montgomery, J.,
The primary question in this appeal is the effect of a general release signed by both appellees “. . . of any damage, loss or injury, which heretofore have been or which hereafter may be sustained by us in consequence of accident which occurred on 11-17-60 at McKeesport, Pa.”, and which contained a further provision that, “This release extends and applies to, and also covers and includes, all unknown, unforeseen, unanticipated and unsuspected injuries . . .”
The consideration for the release was $130.42, the amount of the lowest estimate received by appellant for the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Menarde v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Fink v. Sheldon Axle & Spring Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- McCrosson v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Flaccus v. WoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Brill's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McFadden v. American Oil Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Wm. A. Smith Contracting Co., Inc. v. The Travelers Indemnity Company, and the Delaware River Port AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Restifo v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Leibowitz v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.