Legal Opinion

Dezelan v. Duquesne Light Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 23, 1939No. Appeal, 22PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

In an action of trespass for personal injuries, a verdict for $5,500 was returned in favor of plaintiff. From the judgment entered following the refusal of the court below to enter judgment n. o. v. or to grant a new trial, defendant company took this appeal.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff, we must nevertheless conclude that the judgment n. o. v. should have been granted since plaintiff is barred by his own negligence. Prior to July 21, 1933, there stood at the curb line of Dersham Street in the City of Pittsburgh, immediately in front…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Robinson v. American Ice Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Handfinger v. Barnwell Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Currier v. Trustees of Dartmouth CollegeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1902
  4. Szanborsky v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Chernuka v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Downing v. ShafferSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Valente v. LindnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Bryan v. SweeneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  4. Shula v. WarrenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Daugert v. Scranton Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API