Legal Opinion

Daugert v. Scranton Contracting Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 13, 1942No. Appeals, 99 and 113PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Linn,

Both plaintiff and defendant appeal; defendant assigns for error the refusal (1) of its request for binding instructions, (2) of its motion for judgment n. o. v., (3) of a request for charge, quoted below. The plaintiff’s appeal is from an order granting a new trial.

The defendant, since August 1, 1939, had been engaged in stripping operations removing the rock, earth, etc., referred to as overburden, from a vein of coal on land known as Green’s farm in Wilkes-Barre Township. Defendant used a large shovel or bucket attached to a drag-line operated by an engine with a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Frederick v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Fornelli v. Penna. R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Kapuscianski v. Philadelphia & Reading C. & I. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Fox v. BorkeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  5. Dimarco v. Penna. R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bennett v. BoneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Biedrzycki v. A. J. Schrader, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Kakias v. United States Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  4. Pietruszka v. Bethlehem Mines Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Chamberlain v. Penn-Rich Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API