Daugert v. Scranton Contracting Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Linn,
Both plaintiff and defendant appeal; defendant assigns for error the refusal (1) of its request for binding instructions, (2) of its motion for judgment n. o. v., (3) of a request for charge, quoted below. The plaintiff’s appeal is from an order granting a new trial.
The defendant, since August 1, 1939, had been engaged in stripping operations removing the rock, earth, etc., referred to as overburden, from a vein of coal on land known as Green’s farm in Wilkes-Barre Township. Defendant used a large shovel or bucket attached to a drag-line operated by an engine with a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Frederick v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Fornelli v. Penna. R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Kapuscianski v. Philadelphia & Reading C. & I. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Fox v. BorkeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- Dimarco v. Penna. R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bennett v. BoneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Biedrzycki v. A. J. Schrader, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Kakias v. United States Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Pietruszka v. Bethlehem Mines Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
- Chamberlain v. Penn-Rich Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.