Legal Opinion

Chernuka v. Philadelphia Electric Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 24, 1935No. Appeal, 239PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

Plaintiff appeals from judgment n. o. v. in her action brought to recover for the death of her husband. He came in contact with defendant’s high tension wire in circumstances which prevent recovery.

On the night of May 20, 1933, a storm broke a pole about a foot from the ground; after the pole fell the upper end rested on a cross-arm. The pole had a number of such cross-arms carrying wires which remained in place. The fall of this pole drew toward it the next pole (without bringing it down) causing the wires to sag. No wire in the vicinity of the fallen pole rested…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Haertel v. Pennsylvania Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  2. Jones v. Counties Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Williams v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Hoke v. Edison Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Bass v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dezelan v. Duquesne Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Pfahler v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Szuwalla Et Ux. v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Heber v. Puget Sound Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Morris v. Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API